Semgrep is a static application security testing (SAST) platform that helps development and security teams find and fix vulnerabilities in code. Unlike traditional security scanners, Semgrep uses lightweight pattern matching to analyze code across multiple languages, enabling teams to write custom rules, enforce security policies, and integrate security checks directly into CI/CD pipelines. Organizations use Semgrep to shift security left, reduce manual code review overhead, and maintain compliance with security standards.
Understanding Semgrep's pricing structure is essential for teams evaluating the platform or preparing for renewal. Semgrep offers both open-source and commercial tiers, with pricing driven by factors including the number of developers, repositories scanned, deployment model (cloud vs. self-hosted), and access to advanced features like supply chain security and custom rule management.
Evaluating Semgrep or planning a purchase?
Vendr's pricing analysis agent uses anonymized contract data to show what similar companies typically pay and where negotiation leverage exists—whether you're estimating budget, comparing options, or reviewing a quote. Explore Semgrep pricing with Vendr.
This guide combines Semgrep's published pricing with Vendr's dataset and analysis to break down Semgrep pricing in 2026, including:
Whether you're evaluating Semgrep for the first time or preparing for renewal, this guide is designed to help you budget accurately and negotiate with clearer market context.
Semgrep pricing in 2026 is structured around three primary tiers: Community (Free), Team, and Enterprise. Pricing is typically based on the number of active developers or committers, with additional costs for advanced features, premium support, and deployment options.
Pricing model overview:
How much does Semgrep Community (Free) cost? Free, with no per-developer or per-repository fees.
Pricing Structure: Free, with no per-developer or per-repository fees.
What's included:
Limitations:
Observed Outcomes: Many teams start with Community to evaluate Semgrep's capabilities before upgrading to Team or Enterprise as security requirements and team size grow.
Benchmarking context: While Community is free, teams planning to scale should compare Team and Enterprise pricing with Vendr to understand the cost of transitioning to commercial tiers.
How much does Semgrep Team cost? Semgrep Team is the commercial tier designed for growing engineering teams that need centralized security policy management, cloud-hosted deployment, and priority support.
Pricing Structure: Typically priced per active developer per month, billed annually. Published list pricing generally ranges from $40–$80 per developer per month, though actual pricing varies based on team size, contract term, and negotiation.
What's included:
Observed Outcomes: Buyers often achieve below-list pricing, particularly for multi-year commitments or larger developer counts. Volume-based discounting and prepayment terms commonly yield better per-developer rates.
Benchmarking context: Vendr's transaction data shows that Team tier pricing varies significantly based on developer count and contract structure, with observed outcomes often landing below published list rates for teams negotiating annual or multi-year deals.
How much does Semgrep Enterprise cost? Semgrep Enterprise is the top-tier offering with custom pricing, designed for large organizations requiring advanced security features, flexible deployment, and dedicated support.
Pricing Structure: Custom pricing based on number of developers, deployment model (cloud, self-hosted, or hybrid), and feature requirements. Enterprise contracts typically start in the mid-five figures annually and scale with organization size.
What's included:
Observed Outcomes: Enterprise pricing is highly variable and negotiable. Buyers often secure meaningful discounts through multi-year commitments, volume-based pricing, and competitive pressure from alternatives like Snyk or Checkmarx.
Benchmarking context: Vendr's pricing analysis provides percentile-based benchmarks for Enterprise contracts across different developer counts and deployment models, helping buyers assess whether a given quote reflects recent market outcomes.
Understanding the factors that influence Semgrep pricing helps buyers budget accurately and identify negotiation opportunities.
1. Number of active developers Semgrep's commercial tiers are priced per active developer or committer. The definition of "active" can vary—some contracts count all developers with repository access, while others count only those who commit code within a given period. Clarifying this definition is critical to avoiding unexpected costs.
2. Deployment model Cloud-hosted deployments are typically included in Team and Enterprise pricing, but self-hosted or hybrid deployments may incur additional costs for setup, maintenance, and support. Organizations with strict data residency or compliance requirements should budget for these deployment options.
3. Contract term length Multi-year contracts generally unlock better per-developer pricing and more favorable terms. Semgrep, like many SaaS vendors, offers discounts for longer commitments to secure predictable revenue.
4. Add-ons and advanced features Features like advanced supply chain security, secrets scanning, custom rule development, and professional services are often priced separately. Buyers should clarify which features are included in base pricing and which require additional investment.
5. Support tier and SLAs Enterprise customers can negotiate custom SLAs, dedicated support, and faster response times. These services typically add to the base contract cost but can be critical for organizations with strict uptime or compliance requirements.
6. Volume and growth Larger developer counts often unlock volume-based discounting. Buyers should negotiate pricing tiers that accommodate expected growth without triggering mid-contract price increases.
Benchmarking context: Vendr's pricing tools help buyers model total cost across these variables and compare outcomes to similar organizations, ensuring budget accuracy and negotiation leverage.
Beyond base subscription pricing, Semgrep buyers should budget for several additional costs that can materially impact total spend.
1. Implementation and onboarding While Semgrep is designed for developer self-service, larger organizations often require professional services for initial setup, rule customization, CI/CD integration, and team training. These services are typically priced separately and can range from a few thousand dollars for basic onboarding to tens of thousands for complex, multi-team deployments.
2. Professional services for custom rule development Organizations with unique security requirements may need custom rules tailored to their codebase, frameworks, or compliance standards. Semgrep offers professional services for rule development, which can add meaningful cost depending on scope and complexity.
3. Self-hosted deployment costs Self-hosted or hybrid deployments may require additional infrastructure, maintenance, and support. Buyers should account for internal engineering time, hosting costs, and potential premium support fees.
4. Add-on features Advanced supply chain security, secrets detection, and other premium features are often priced separately. Buyers should clarify which features are included in base pricing and which require additional investment.
5. Support and SLA upgrades Enterprise customers negotiating custom SLAs or dedicated support should budget for these services, which are typically priced as a percentage of the base contract or as a flat annual fee.
6. Overage fees Some contracts include overage fees if the number of active developers exceeds the contracted amount. Buyers should negotiate clear definitions of "active developer" and ensure pricing tiers accommodate expected growth.
7. Renewal price increases Semgrep contracts may include annual price escalators (typically 5–10%) or renewal pricing adjustments. Buyers should negotiate caps on renewal increases and clarify pricing for future years.
Benchmarking context: Vendr's contract analysis helps buyers identify hidden costs and compare total cost of ownership across similar deals, ensuring budget accuracy and reducing surprises.
Semgrep pricing varies widely based on team size, deployment model, contract term, and negotiation. While published list pricing provides a starting point, actual outcomes often differ significantly.
Small teams (10–25 developers): Teams in this range typically evaluate Semgrep Team, with annual contracts often landing in the low-to-mid five figures. Buyers commonly achieve below-list pricing through annual commitments and competitive evaluation.
Mid-market teams (25–100 developers): Mid-market buyers often negotiate Team or Enterprise pricing, with annual contracts typically ranging from the mid-five figures to low-six figures. Volume-based discounting and multi-year terms commonly yield better per-developer rates.
Enterprise teams (100+ developers): Large organizations typically negotiate custom Enterprise pricing, with annual contracts often reaching six figures or more depending on developer count, deployment model, and feature requirements. Multi-year commitments and competitive pressure from alternatives like Snyk or Checkmarx often result in meaningful discounts.
Key variables influencing pricing:
Benchmarking context: Based on anonymized Semgrep transactions in Vendr's dataset, buyers who prepare carefully and evaluate alternatives often secure meaningfully better pricing. Vendr's benchmarking tools provide percentile-based ranges and comparable deal data to help buyers assess whether a given quote reflects recent market outcomes.
Semgrep pricing is negotiable, and buyers who prepare strategically often achieve better outcomes. These insights are based on anonymized Semgrep deals in Vendr's dataset and observed negotiation patterns.
Semgrep's sales team is more flexible when buyers engage early and establish a clear decision timeline. Avoid rushing into a deal without evaluating alternatives or understanding market pricing. Early engagement also allows time to test the platform, gather internal feedback, and build a stronger negotiation position.
Competitive benchmarks: Vendr's pricing data shows that buyers who evaluate multiple SAST vendors (Snyk, Checkmarx, Veracode) and share competitive context often secure better pricing and terms.
Rather than accepting the vendor's initial quote, anchor the conversation to your budget and comparable market outcomes. Reference pricing from similar organizations (without disclosing specific competitors) to establish a credible baseline.
Vendr data shows that buyers who anchor early and reference market context often achieve 15–30% below initial quotes, particularly for multi-year commitments.
Semgrep, like most SaaS vendors, offers better per-developer pricing for multi-year commitments. Buyers willing to commit to two or three years can often unlock meaningful discounts, but should negotiate clear pricing for future years and caps on renewal increases.
Negotiation guidance: Vendr's transaction data shows that multi-year deals commonly achieve 20–35% better pricing than annual contracts, but buyers should ensure flexibility for scope changes and avoid auto-renewal clauses without clear pricing terms.
Semgrep's pricing is based on active developers, but the definition can vary. Some contracts count all developers with repository access, while others count only those who commit code within a given period. Negotiate a clear, favorable definition to avoid unexpected costs.
Semgrep competes with Snyk, Checkmarx, Veracode, and other SAST vendors. Buyers actively evaluating alternatives often secure better pricing and terms. Be prepared to share competitive context (without bluffing) to create leverage.
Competitive context: Vendr's competitive analysis helps buyers understand how Semgrep pricing compares to alternatives for similar requirements, strengthening negotiation position.
Advanced features like supply chain security, secrets scanning, and custom rule development are often priced separately. Buyers should negotiate these add-ons independently and clarify which features are included in base pricing.
Many Semgrep contracts include auto-renewal clauses and annual price escalators (typically 5–10%). Buyers should negotiate caps on renewal increases, require advance notice for renewals, and ensure flexibility to adjust scope or terminate if needs change.
Semgrep's fiscal year ends in December, and sales teams often have stronger incentives to close deals in Q4. Buyers with flexibility should consider timing negotiations to align with vendor quarter-end or year-end to maximize leverage.
These insights are based on anonymized Semgrep deals in Vendr's dataset across a wide range of company sizes and contract structures. Buyers can explore these insights directly using Vendr's free pricing and negotiation tools:
Pricing benchmarks: Get percentile-based Semgrep pricing ranges — target price ranges, percentiles, and comparable deals for your team size and deployment model.
Competitive context: Compare Semgrep to alternatives — see how Semgrep pricing and terms compare to Snyk, Checkmarx, and Veracode for similar requirements.
Negotiation guidance: Access Semgrep negotiation playbooks — supplier-specific tactics, timing strategies, and leverage points by deal type (new purchase vs. renewal).
Semgrep competes with several SAST and application security platforms, each with different pricing models and cost structures. Understanding these differences helps buyers evaluate total cost and negotiate effectively.
| Pricing component | Semgrep | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
| Base pricing model | Per active developer | Per active developer |
| Team tier (list) | ~$40–$80/developer/month | ~$50–$100/developer/month |
| Enterprise tier | Custom pricing | Custom pricing |
| Free tier | Yes (Community) | Yes (Free tier) |
| Typical annual contract (50 developers) | Mid-five figures | Mid-to-high five figures |
Snyk's pricing is generally higher than Semgrep's, particularly for teams requiring container security, infrastructure-as-code scanning, and open-source dependency management in addition to SAST.
Semgrep focuses primarily on SAST and supply chain security, while Snyk offers a broader application security platform including container, IaC, and open-source scanning. Buyers should compare total cost based on required capabilities.
Based on Vendr transaction data, both vendors commonly negotiate 20–30% below list pricing for multi-year commitments and larger developer counts.
Snyk's pricing can increase significantly with add-ons and advanced features, while Semgrep's pricing is generally more predictable for SAST-focused use cases.
Benchmarking context: Vendr's competitive pricing analysis helps buyers compare Semgrep and Snyk pricing for similar scope and identify which vendor offers better value for their specific requirements.
| Pricing component | Semgrep | Checkmarx |
|---|---|---|
| Base pricing model | Per active developer | Per application or per developer |
| Team/Professional tier | ~$40–$80/developer/month | Custom pricing (typically higher) |
| Enterprise tier | Custom pricing | Custom pricing |
| Free tier | Yes (Community) | No |
| Typical annual contract (50 developers) | Mid-five figures | High-five to low-six figures |
Checkmarx is generally more expensive than Semgrep, particularly for teams that don't require Checkmarx's broader application security platform (SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC).
Checkmarx pricing is often based on the number of applications scanned or developers, with significant variation depending on deployment model and feature requirements.
Semgrep's lightweight, developer-friendly approach typically results in faster deployment and lower total cost for teams focused primarily on SAST.
In observed Vendr transactions, Checkmarx buyers often negotiate 25–40% below initial quotes, particularly for multi-year commitments and competitive evaluations.
Benchmarking context: Vendr's pricing benchmarks provide percentile-based ranges for both Semgrep and Checkmarx, helping buyers assess which vendor offers better value for their security requirements.
| Pricing component | Semgrep | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Base pricing model | Per active developer | Per application or per developer |
| Team/Professional tier | ~$40–$80/developer/month | Custom pricing (typically higher) |
| Enterprise tier | Custom pricing | Custom pricing |
| Free tier | Yes (Community) | No |
| Typical annual contract (50 developers) | Mid-five figures | High-five to six figures |
Veracode is typically more expensive than Semgrep, with pricing often based on the number of applications scanned, scan frequency, and feature requirements.
Veracode offers a broader application security platform including SAST, DAST, SCA, and manual penetration testing, which can justify higher pricing for organizations requiring comprehensive security coverage.
Semgrep's focus on SAST and developer-centric workflows typically results in lower cost and faster time-to-value for teams that don't require Veracode's full platform.
Based on anonymized Veracode transactions in Vendr's platform, buyers often achieve 20–35% below initial quotes through multi-year commitments and competitive pressure.
Benchmarking context: Compare Semgrep and Veracode pricing with Vendr to understand total cost differences and identify which vendor offers better value for your specific security requirements.
Based on anonymized Semgrep transactions in Vendr's platform over the past 12 months:
Multi-year commitments commonly yield 15–30% lower per-developer pricing compared to annual contracts.
Volume-based discounting often applies for teams with 50+ developers, with observed outcomes achieving 20–35% below list pricing.
Competitive pressure from alternatives like Snyk, Checkmarx, or Veracode frequently results in additional 10–20% concessions on initial quotes.
Prepayment terms (annual upfront vs. quarterly) can unlock 5–10% additional savings.
Vendr's dataset shows that buyers who evaluate alternatives, anchor to budget, and negotiate multi-year terms often achieve 25–40% below initial quotes for Team and Enterprise tiers.
Negotiation guidance: Vendr's Semgrep negotiation playbooks provide supplier-specific tactics, timing strategies, and leverage points to help buyers maximize discounts and secure favorable terms.
Based on Semgrep transactions in Vendr's database:
Buyers who negotiate strategically often achieve 20–35% below initial quotes, particularly for multi-year commitments and larger developer counts.
First-time buyers with competitive alternatives under evaluation commonly secure 15–25% discounts on Team tier pricing.
Renewal buyers with strong negotiation leverage (competitive alternatives, budget constraints, or scope reductions) often achieve 10–20% savings compared to renewal quotes.
Vendr data shows that the most significant savings come from multi-year commitments, volume-based pricing, and competitive pressure from alternatives like Snyk or Checkmarx.
Benchmarking context: Vendr's pricing analysis shows percentile-based benchmarks and observed negotiation outcomes, helping buyers assess realistic savings opportunities for their specific scope.
Based on Vendr transaction data:
Annual contracts are most common for first-time buyers and smaller teams, offering flexibility but typically higher per-developer pricing.
Multi-year contracts (2–3 years) are increasingly common for mid-market and enterprise buyers, unlocking 15–30% better pricing and more favorable terms.
Month-to-month or quarterly contracts are rare and typically reserved for pilot programs or very small teams.
Buyers should negotiate clear pricing for future years in multi-year contracts and avoid auto-renewal clauses without advance notice and pricing caps.
Negotiation guidance: Vendr's contract analysis tools help buyers evaluate term-length trade-offs and negotiate favorable multi-year pricing with flexibility for scope changes.
Based on anonymized Semgrep contracts in Vendr's platform:
Professional services for onboarding, custom rule development, and integration can add $5,000–$50,000+ depending on scope and complexity.
Self-hosted deployment may incur additional infrastructure, maintenance, and support costs not included in base pricing.
Add-on features like advanced supply chain security, secrets scanning, and custom SLAs are often priced separately and can add 10–30% to total contract value.
Overage fees for exceeding contracted developer counts can be significant; buyers should negotiate clear definitions of "active developer" and pricing tiers that accommodate growth.
Renewal price increases (typically 5–10% annually) are common; buyers should negotiate caps on renewal pricing and require advance notice.
Vendr's dataset shows that buyers who clarify all-in costs upfront and negotiate add-ons separately often achieve 10–20% lower total cost of ownership.
Benchmarking context: Vendr's contract analysis helps buyers identify hidden costs and compare total cost of ownership across similar deals.
Based on Vendr transaction data and observed negotiation patterns:
Q4 (October–December) aligns with Semgrep's fiscal year-end, when sales teams have stronger incentives to close deals and often offer better pricing and terms.
Quarter-end (March, June, September, December) typically provides additional leverage as sales teams work to meet quarterly targets.
60–90 days before renewal gives buyers time to evaluate alternatives, gather competitive quotes, and negotiate without time pressure.
Early engagement (3–6 months before decision deadline) allows time to test the platform, build internal consensus, and strengthen negotiation position.
Vendr data shows that buyers who time negotiations strategically and avoid last-minute renewals often achieve 15–25% better pricing compared to rushed deals.
Negotiation guidance: Vendr's negotiation playbooks provide timing strategies and leverage points tailored to your deal type (new purchase vs. renewal) and decision timeline.
Semgrep Team includes cloud-hosted deployment, advanced rule management, priority support, CI/CD integrations, secrets scanning, and basic supply chain security. It's designed for growing engineering teams that need centralized policy management and faster support.
Semgrep Enterprise adds self-hosted or hybrid deployment, advanced supply chain security, SSO, custom SLAs, dedicated customer success, professional services, and advanced reporting. It's designed for large organizations with strict compliance, data residency, or customization requirements.
Benchmarking context: Compare Team and Enterprise pricing with Vendr to understand cost differences and determine which tier offers better value for your requirements.
Yes. Semgrep Community is the open-source tier, available at no cost with unlimited scans, core SAST functionality, and community support. It's suitable for individual developers and small teams comfortable with self-service tooling.
Community does not include cloud-hosted deployment, centralized policy management, priority support, or advanced features like supply chain security and secrets scanning. Teams requiring these capabilities should evaluate Team or Enterprise tiers.
Semgrep supports 30+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, Go, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, C#, Kotlin, Swift, Rust, and more. It also supports popular frameworks like React, Django, Flask, Spring, and Rails.
Semgrep's pattern-matching engine allows teams to write custom rules for any language or framework, making it highly flexible for organizations with diverse tech stacks.
Yes. Semgrep integrates with popular CI/CD platforms including GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI, Bitbucket Pipelines, and Azure DevOps. It also integrates with ticketing and collaboration tools like JIRA, Slack, and ServiceNow.
Team and Enterprise tiers include advanced integrations and centralized policy management, while Community tier offers basic CLI and CI/CD integrations.
Yes. Semgrep Enterprise supports self-hosted and hybrid deployment options for organizations with strict data residency, compliance, or security requirements. Self-hosted deployments may incur additional setup, maintenance, and support costs.
Semgrep Team is cloud-hosted only, while Community is self-hosted by default (open-source CLI).
Benchmarking context: Vendr's pricing data shows that self-hosted Enterprise deployments typically cost more than cloud-hosted Team deployments, but may be required for organizations with strict compliance or data residency requirements.
Based on analysis of anonymized Semgrep deals in Vendr's dataset, buyers who prepare carefully and evaluate alternatives often secure meaningfully better pricing. Recent data from Vendr shows that buyers who anchor to budget, negotiate multi-year terms, and leverage competitive pressure often achieve 20–35% below initial quotes.
Key takeaways:
Semgrep pricing is based on active developers, with Team tier typically ranging from $40–$80 per developer per month (list) and Enterprise tier priced custom based on deployment and feature requirements.
Multi-year commitments, volume-based pricing, and competitive evaluation commonly unlock better per-developer rates and more favorable terms.
Hidden costs including professional services, self-hosted deployment, add-ons, and renewal price increases can materially impact total cost of ownership.
Buyers should clarify the definition of "active developer," negotiate clear pricing for future years, and avoid auto-renewal clauses without advance notice and pricing caps.
Timing negotiations to align with Semgrep's fiscal year-end (Q4) or quarter-end often provides additional leverage.
Regardless of platform choice, the most important step is clearly defining requirements, understanding total cost drivers, and benchmarking pricing against comparable deals before committing.
Vendr's pricing and negotiation tools analyze anonymized transaction data to surface percentile-based benchmarks, competitive comparisons, and observed negotiation patterns, helping buyers assess how a given Semgrep quote compares to recent market outcomes for similar scope.
This guide is updated regularly to reflect recent Semgrep pricing and negotiation trends. Consider revisiting it ahead of any new purchase or renewal to account for changing market conditions. Last updated: February 2026.